Thursday, February 03, 2005

Defeating Republican Scams

I didn't watch the State of the Union speech by the twice appointed ruler of America....I had more important activities to attend to. Instead, I attended my local Democratic meeting to listen to the Boulder County Sheriff, Joe Pelle, talk about the Patriot Act and it's effects on local law enforcement. I won't go into all the details but, there is one very interesting situation he did address. Illegal and undocumented workers.

The Patriot Act, according to Sheriff Pelle, has shift the burden of enforcing immigration laws to the state and local law enforcement agencies. He explained that by doing this, people who are here illegally or have no documentation are fearful of contacting law enforcement when a spouse or employer abuses them. His concerns were that, his department is a public safety entity and is placed in an awkward position by the Act. It is a clear ploy by the republican party to maintain cheap labor for their corporate donors because, if law enforcement endorses the position of maintaining public safety and trust then, they cannot enforce immigration laws effectively without violating the trust of people being abused or victimized by crime.

The next issue on the agenda was Social Security. What most people hear in the republican controlled media is that, the Trust Fund will be bankrupt or will go bust by some particular date (depending on which spin channel you view). The largest drain at this point in time is the tax cuts for the rich and the illegal occupation of Iraq by Imperial America. Many economists have shown, with great accuracy, that the tax cuts are the largest problem with Social Security at this time. Repeal of these cuts would keep Social Security viable, indefinitely.

What we see now is a blatant waste of taxpayer money, funding stolen from the Social Security Trust and increased borrowing from this appointed regime to carry out the fraud on America. The republican party has always been a party of economic failure and it is no different now. Social programs, organized labor and brown people are being attacked by the racist right around the world and, with these actions there comes good news. Good news that accompanies the defeat of any bully or liar....The demise of the republican party.

Working people should take a strong stance against the anti-working people republicans in several ways. One way is to involve yourself in the political process. If a worker, who is republican, supports the party of economic failure then, that worker consistently votes against his/her best interests. Educating these workers is difficult. They are conditioned to soundbites; small bits of information that are designed to mislead. Breaking through the shell of the closed conservative mind is not impossible. During the 2004 election, republican voters who supported the occupation of Iraq, were asked which one of their children they would choose to die in this war. The answer was always a resounding, "None of them", but it was explained that they had no choice and they must sacrifice one of their children. This strategy worked quite well and strengthened the Democratic Base. This action showed that lying is not necessary to bring about truth but, only to run on a campaign of fear that was so well demonstrated by the republican party.

Another way to demonstrate to a republican worker that their interests are not a consideration of the republican party is to address the bankruptcy laws being utilized today. Corporations are being allowed to use the bankruptcy system to steal pension and healthcare funds from workers who have worked for them, earned them and deserve these benefits. A good way of breaking through the closed conservative mind is to get between them and their money. This action also, helped the Democratic base with an increase in membership.

Through all the smoke and mirrors, activists, like myself, are seeing the demise of the republican party. Covertly attending local republican meetings one can see and sense the fear and urgency these people have. They know they are dying as a party and they are beginning to turn on their own legislators. And I am more than happy to agitate their little world.

Simple minds are an easy thing to waste.

20 Comments:

At 2/03/2005 4:39 PM , Blogger Union Patriot said...

Immigration is a federal issue and, the Sheriff does not feel he should be enforcing it. The opinion is not mine.'I pay Federal tax for the issues like immigration and it should be handled by the Feds.
The chimp's regime is in business for corporate interests only and not ours.

 
At 2/03/2005 4:41 PM , Blogger Union Patriot said...

On the issue of voting republican...I, personally don't want you on my side. I prefer people with a backbone not a flip-flopper.

 
At 2/03/2005 6:50 PM , Blogger Union Patriot said...

Flip flopper is what Kerry was called but, it is what the republicans do.
I agree...you should stay on the right....you don't understand the underlying issues and we aren't here to be your teacher.
Terrorism isn't a local law enforcement issue either.

 
At 2/03/2005 7:15 PM , Blogger Union Patriot said...

I never left the issue......are you getting confused??

 
At 2/03/2005 7:29 PM , Blogger 88 said...

You should have watched the State of Union Address and you would have realised why you lost and we won. It is a difficult concept but when people invade your country someone must pay. Thank God that the majority of Americans agree.

 
At 2/03/2005 7:49 PM , Blogger Union Patriot said...

What comments babs?? You claimed the Sheriff's concerns were mine. You claim I don't realize terrorism is a federal issue.

You aren't hard to 'skirt' you have no mental order. Abstract or maybe scatter-brained possibly.

 
At 2/03/2005 7:52 PM , Blogger Union Patriot said...

Actually 88, I don't watch the chimp ever. I don't like the lies and scams he and his handlers pull on America.

It wasn't actually a SOTU...it was an infomercial to scam people into a ponzi scheme.

As far as losing....prove that the Democrats lost....there is still an investigation ongoing..if you know something then bay all means report it. But, the election is a moot point now...the chimp was selected by Congress this time.

 
At 2/04/2005 6:15 AM , Blogger Union Patriot said...

I answered that....local law enforcement needs to act in the scope of public safety defined by trust...I have never heard any liberal suggest terrorism be handled by local law enforcement....centrists maybe but, not liberals.

 
At 2/06/2005 3:20 PM , Blogger Union Patriot said...

babs....Amy knows the answers to the questions she asked you. Now, answer her questions...quit avoiding the issues and, by all means, quit skirting the issues.

 
At 2/06/2005 4:36 PM , Blogger Union Patriot said...

You didn't answer the questions..

 
At 2/09/2005 6:06 AM , Blogger Michael Moore-on said...

Being in law enforcement, I feel somewhat qualified to speak on this. I work for a county. Lib, should I only enforce county laws? According to your logic, state police will enforce state laws, municipalities will enforce town laws. It's ludicrous! I live in a border state with a seasonal immigrant population, it would be foolish to simply rely on the federal government to patrol our borders. We (law enforcement) come into contact with far more people in any given day. That whining Sheriffs assertion that illegal immigrants will not call LE because of poor documentation is a crock. They won't call PERIOD because they will be deported. If the Sheriff refuses to do it, his agency would have to at least make the referral to the feds, and bingo! same outcome.

By the way, this was huge problem even under slick willie, how it became a "republican scam" under the Patriot Act is intensely interesting to me. We've been dealing with this situation for decades. No points for you.

 
At 2/09/2005 8:45 AM , Blogger Union Patriot said...

I don't know what kind of law enforcemnet you are in but, the illegals do call local law when abuse occurs. The sheriff, a very good one by the way, does not want the trust they have to be lost to some repig scam the chimp is trying to push through in order to cut costs and propel his budget.
Being in Maine....you don't have a clue when it comes to illegal immigration from the south....not even close to a clue.
The Feds enact federal laws then....the feds enforce them. Local law can enforce the laws made by locals.

 
At 2/09/2005 8:46 AM , Blogger Union Patriot said...

If the patriot Act were enforced like the chimp wants it....the borders would be closed but, he can't do that....his corporate pals needs cheap labor from the south.

 
At 2/09/2005 11:45 AM , Blogger Michael Moore-on said...

Lib, ALL of our illegal immigrants come from the SOUTH. Every summer and fall I have to re-learn spanish as mexicans (some vietnamese) flood our state to pick blueberries, strawberries, potatoes and broccoli. There is a core that stays and works various egg farms. Try not to educate me about Maine, I don't pretend to know Colorado. I work for a sheriff's department myself, 15 years. They simply DON'T call. If that sheriff is not making referrals then he should be voted out. You can't pick and choose the laws you'll enforce.

 
At 2/09/2005 1:00 PM , Blogger Michael Moore-on said...

Amy, jeez, we republicans like sound bites remember? First, we DO have ILLEGAL immigrants here in Maine, they are the ones I was referring to, not the legal variety. The illegal ones get hired at less money and never EVER call the police. Second, I wasn't suggesting that we (LE) become the Border Patrol, just that we can (and should) be included in the overall picture to tighten our borders. My buddy Lib was suggesting (among other things) that because they are breaking federal law, this enormous task should fall squarely on the feds. Thirdly, illegal immigrants (here) assume they will be deported once caught, so they run...often, at least I assume that's what they're thinking when they take off. Next time, don't be so quick to judge.

 
At 2/09/2005 1:53 PM , Blogger Union Patriot said...

Maine is a long ways from the Mexican border. Your law enforcement problems with illegals is nothing compared to what we get in Colorado or New Mexico or Arizona.
You may spend $5 more in taxes to cover the costs of enforcing Federal law but, it is going to cost me $100. There is a big difference between there and here. Colorado, specifically the intersection of I-25 & I-70, has more illegal immigrants pass through it than any other place in America.

Thanks for the input Amy!!

 
At 2/10/2005 6:07 AM , Blogger Michael Moore-on said...

Um, Amy you missed the point and then morphed it into something else. I was merely pointing out that ILLEGAL immigrants aren't going to call the police no matter what kind of relationship you claim to have with them. Changing their status is the only solution. That in itself opens another whole can of worms.

Lib, nice try with $5 and the $100, but the Feds tax us equally. They don't target states by the services they (we) provide. By your logic the Navy bases in Norfolk must cost Virginia (not all Americans) Billions.

 
At 2/10/2005 8:14 AM , Blogger Union Patriot said...

My logic is fine.....I am able to coinsider more than just Federal taxes. If you reread what I said you will see I am talking about local taxes going to federal enforcement....a much higher expense here that in Maine.

 
At 2/10/2005 10:40 AM , Blogger Michael Moore-on said...

I doubt it Lib, check your sources, Maine is THE highest taxed state in the country. We just narrowly lost a tax cap to Gov. Baldacci's lies. Certainly not a bragging point here...

 
At 2/10/2005 11:38 AM , Blogger Union Patriot said...

Again...relative....nothing to do with overall tax rates....relative rates proportional to the amount of load on the local enforcers relative to the immigration issue.
My taxes would be lower if the problems were addressed outside the 'lock 'em up' attitudes of the state republicans.
Look up Congressman Tancredo....look at what the real problem is.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home